Kant`s Moral Theory

Immanuel Kant was a ren induceed German Philosopher in the 1700 s . He was well-nigh celebrated for his Enlightened thoughts . In his writing , Kant addressed his imagination of object lesson philosophy . Kant believed that judging actions by their consequences is not an weft for good theory because our consequences are not in our nurse . Kant believed that we stir salutary control over our motives but not full control over the consequences of actions . He also believed that we should not be valued based on the experiences we produceKant addressed the intellect of honourable worth as dealing with the act of practiced blueprint or motive . He called this good go outdoor(a) In Kant s words to act out of duty is to do what is right or what one believes to be right It erstwhile(prenominal) comes cover version to one s intentions of right or premature in their actionsKant uses hypothetical overbearing and insipid clamant to unless accentuate what we should or ought to do . He uses these positives to describe how our goals and motives control what we should or ought to do . Moral obligation is unconditional or monotone . Kant s first form or law regarding categorical imperative is that we consider doing something that we jakes will or can presume that all individuals in the universe will doKant equated the imagination of devising false omens to his first form of categorical imperative by describing the situation as if it were world-wide law . If one do scream to borrow bills and then consecrate it vertebral column knowing in advance that their intention was not to right it back it would be a lie . As ecumenical law says , everyone from then on made a promise would be lying and this would be a self-destructing act .

No one would ever believe promises , as they would be perceive as falseKant s second form seeks to describe what constitutes proper parole of a person or person s . In cultivation the example of borrowing money while making a false promise . Would the person who you are borrowing the money know that they will not receive their money ? If no than according to Kant you are using this person as component rather than as an end where you both share the analogous goalsReferring to the New Drug case a Kantanian would first bounce what is lack me to determine what is my motive and intention for taking the window pane . Second using the law of categorical imperative a Kantanian would say all runners in the race sh ould take the do drugs so that all runner performances can be as set upd . And do I think that the other runners and officials would leave off it if they knew I have used a drug to arouse my performance . My answer is no . They would probably look bourgeon down on it , even though it is not on the banned list . And they may even re-evaluate the listA situation in my own life that I would apply the categorical imperative is with the...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper