English Consonants

RESEARCH PAPERS 23 How Many Consonant Sounds Are thither in side of meat? How Many Consonant Sounds Are T here(predicate) in incline? by David Deterding, National Institute of Education, capital of capital of Singapore . Most break downs jeer that at that place ar 24 accordant sounds in side. However, it is valuable to sh atomic number 18 in some detail a few issues that affect the berth of these consonants.First, we bottomland think about why the affricates /t? / and /d / argon treated as single consonants alternatively than sequences of twain consonants. Second, one superpower discuss why it is that /w/ and /j/ be categorize as consonants rather than vowels. Third, thither is the hatchway of a voiceless counterpart of /w/ that, for some speakers, distinctiates which from witch. And utmostly, there is the question of whether the velar consonant nasal /? / is actually an allophone of /n/. After considering these issues, most people will quiet abstain that ther e ar 24 consonants in side.However, the discussion can help us gain a deeper pinch of position phonemics. . s Introduction How more consonant sounds do you think there argon in English? Of course, most of us k outright that there are 20 consonant letters in our rudiment (or 21 if you include y), except when here we are talking about sounds, non letters.And there is a mismatch mingled with sounds and letters sometimes two letters accept to wager one sound, so that s + h combine to represent the sound /? / and t + h combine for /? /, and sometimes one letter is pronounced as a sequence of two sounds, as x is usually /ks/. So the fall of consonant letters in our alphabet is irrelevant when considering the number of consonant sounds (phonemes) in English. The basic answer to the sure question is that there are 24 consonant sounds in English q 6 stoppages /p b t d k / q 9 fricatives /f v ? ? s z ? / q 2 affricates /t? d / q 3 nasals /m n ? / q 1 lateral-approximant /l / q 3 approximants /w j r/ However, things are never quite as wide-eyed as that in the study of languages, and there are a number of issues that we efficacy consider in more depth q Why are /t? / and /d / visited as single phonemes and not as sequences of two phonemes? q Why are /w/ and /j/ regarded as consonants and not vowels? q Do those people who distinguish which from witch throw one spear carrier phoneme, / /, a voiceless equivalent of /w/? q Should /? / really be regarded as a separate phoneme?Or can it be analysed as an allophone of /n/? s The status of /t? / and /d / The two affricates are each write as a sequence of two symbols, so why do we regard them as single consonants? Why do we not, for example, analyse cease /t? i z/ as having two consonants at the start, /t/ followed by /? /? The answer is that /t? / be shake offs phonologicly as a single sound, all the same if phonetically it is rather similar to a plosive followed by a fricative. In analysing its behavi our, we need to think about the patterns of distri howeverion of /t/ and /? (Laver, 1994365), so we should consider what sequences of sounds can pop off together, particularly at the start of a syllable. English allows quite complex syllable on casts, much(prenominal) as /str/ in run and /spl/ in splash, but it does not generally permit a plosive followed by a fricative, so */pf k/, */ts? / and */k?? p/ are not come-at-able sound outs of English. (In the few cases where the spelling does suggest a plosive followed by a fricative at the start of the word, such(prenominal) as psychology, the plosive is actually unspoken. ) But note that chip /t?? / and check /t? ek/ are perfectly practiced dustup of English. So if we treated /t? / as a sequence of two phonemes, we would guide to unclutter a special exception to the rule that an English word cannot begin with a plosive followed by a fricative. zero(prenominal)e that /t? / can also occur at the end of a word, as with catch / k t? / and rich /r? t? /, and there are no other instances where /? / can occur after a plosive at the end of a word, as */k k? / and */r? p? / are not come-at-able linguistic communication in English. The situation with /d / provides redden stronger evidence.The consonant / / is rather rare in English, and apart from in some recent loan haggle such as genre / ? nr? /, beige /be? /, and rouge /ru / (all of which still sound rather foreign), / / can tho occur in the heart and soul of a word, mostly between two vowels, as in amusement Copyright 2005 Singapore Tertiary English Teachers order1, 2005 STETS Language &038 confabulation Review, Vol. 4, nary(prenominal) (STETS) w 24 David Deterding s The status of /w/ and /j/ If you articulate /w/ and drag it out, it sounds rather like /u /, and similarly /j/ sounds rather like /i / (Roach, 200064).If they sound like vowels, why do we classify /w/ and /j/ as consonants? Sometimes it is valuable to make a distinction between a c ontoid and a consonant contoids are articulated with an obstruction in the vocal tract, but consonants are sounds which can occur at the edge of a syllable (Laver, 1994147-8). In other speech communication, contoid is a phonetic term which describes the articulation of a sound, while consonant is a phonological term which describes its behaviour within a syllable.From the phonetic thought of articulation, we find that plosives, fricatives, nasals, and the lateral approximant /l/ are all contoids, because they all shoot a constriction in the vocal tract, but /j/ and /w/ (and whitethornbe /r/ as well) are not contoids. But now we should consider phonological behaviour and thereby determine which sounds should be classified as consonants. Let us think about what can occur before /et/ to create a monosyllabic English word. We have address such as bet /bet/, pet /pet/, set /set/, net /net/, and debt /det/, but not */? t/ or */ et/, so we regard /b p s n d/ as consonants because they occur at the edge of a syllable, but /? / are vowels. However, note that we can also have wet /wet/ and to that degree / yard/. This confirms that /w/ and /j/ are consonants. In one other aspect of behaviour, we can consider the distribution of the indefinite articles a and an a occurs before consonants, while an occurs before vowels, and this depends on the pronunciation and not the spelling, so it is an hour not *a hour because /a?? / begins with a vowel (the h is silent).But note that we have a waste and a year, not *an waste and *an year, and notice that once more this is based on pronunciation and not on spelling, as it is a university (which begins with /j/) and not *an university. So again we see that /w/ and /j/ represent as consonants, not as vowels (Roach, 200064). s The status of /? / In standard phonemic analysis, we assume that if the occurrence of a sound can be predicted from the skirt sounds, it is regarded as an allophone and not as a phoneme.So, for example, we treat , the dark /l/ sound that occurs at the end of a word such as fill, as an allophone of /l/ because we can specify that it only occurs in the last of a syllable (or as a syllabic consonant in words such as bottle), unlike its clear counterpart which occurs before a vowel. So what about /? /? Note that /? / can also only bulge in the coda of a syllable, and furthermore we can predict that /? / rather than /n/ will always occur before another velar sound, such as in bank /b ? k/ and raise / ? ?/. So should /? / be regarded as an allophone of /n/ (and then be pen as ? rather than /? /)? The crucial test for a phoneme is the existence of a minimal pair if there are two words which only differ with respect to one sound distinction, then we know that we have two separate phonemes. For example, we know that /f/ and /v/ are different phonemes of English because of the existence of the minimal pair fan /f n/ and van /v n/ where the only difference is in the sign consonant, and sim ilarly the difference in the final sound of back /b k/ and bag /b / establishes /k/ and / / as separate phonemes of English.On this pedestal, we can be confident that /n/ and /? / are different phonemes, because we have galore(postnominal) minimal pairs such as sin /s? n/ and sing /s?? /, and also ran /r n/ and rang /r ? /. This would count to be the end of the story, but of course it is not. s The possibility of / / Do you make a distinction between which and witch? For most speakers, these two words are homophones as they are both pronounced as /w? t? /, though many Americans do make a distinction (Wells, 1982126), and most Copyright 2005 Singapore Tertiary English Teachers Society (STETS) w w w /ple ? / and measure /me ? /. But notice that jet /d et/ and barge /b? d / are perfectly good words in English. So if we were to regard /d / as a sequence of two separate sounds, we would have to say that / / can only occur near the start or at the end of a word if it is preceded by /d/ , which would be rather strange. So the necessitate that /t? / and /d / are single sounds in English is well-founded, because they behave phonologically like single sounds in the body structure of English words.However, one readiness note that Ladefoged (200127) does treat both these English affricates as sequences of two sounds, partially because his emphasis is rather more on phonetics than on the phonological structure of English. Scottish speakers also do (Wells, 1982408). Indeed, it was once normal for all speakers of English to make this distinction, but by the end of the eighteenth century even educated southern speakers no longer maintained it (Mugglestone, 2003132). For speakers who retain this distinction, it might be necessary to include an extra phoneme, with / / representing the voiceless counterpart of /w/, so that which is / ? ? / while witch is /w? t? / However, even here the analysis is not so simple. Historically, this sound was a consonant practice bundling /hw /, parallel to other clusters beginning with /h/, such as /hr/, /hn/ and /hl/ (Cruttenden, 2001215). These others have now disappeared, so apart from the possibility of /hw/, the only remaining consonant cluster involving /h/ is /hj/ in words such as huge /hju d / and human /hju m? n/. And even the status of this is doubtful, as one might alternatively regard /ju / as a diphthong (Deterding, 2004).So, from a historical perspective, / / might be treated as /hw/. But from a synchronic perspective, we should note that the contrast between / / and /w/ is parallel to the contrast between many pairs of consonants in English, such as /t/ and /d/, /s/ and /? /, and /f/ and /v/. The circumstance that the voiceless/voiced contrast is wellestablished in English lends support to the handling of / / as a phoneme in its own right. We might therefore think that some speakers do have this extra phoneme. w v w v How Many Consonant Sounds Are There in English? 25 so its fun being with them F9-f40In fact, extra velar plosives also occasionally get inserted at the end of words such as selling, studying and young in relatively free-and-easy Singapore data (Lim &038 Deterding, 2005), as shown in the following examples also from the NIECSSE school principal selling um decorative stuff iF9-c83 that I was studying this iF9-c238 when we were young we utilise to erm iF10-e180 If a velar plosive gets inserted occasionally after /? /, maybe we should analyse it as present in the underlying representation of the word, and then rather of saying that it sometimes gets inserted, we should state that it sometimes fails to get deleted.And if this is the case, s coating It is still basically true that there are 24 consonants in English, though it may under some circumstances be possible to regard /t? / and /d / as sequences of two sounds, some speakers may have an extra phoneme / /, and the status of /? / is questionable. Even though we can conclude that there are 24 consonants in Engli sh, consideration of some of the issues regarding the phonological analysis of English can give us a deeper understanding of he structure of the sound system of the language. STETS Language &038 Communication Review, Vol. 4, No. 1, 2005 w v v An alternative possibility is to say that words like sing have a silent / / at the end, and this silent / / gets deleted when it occurs at the end of a word (Roach, 200068). In fact, for some speakers of English, this deletion rule does not apply and sing is pronounced as s?? (Roach, 200067), so clearly for speakers such as this, we should analyse ? as an allophone of /n/.Furthermore, in careful pronunciation, some speakers insert a velar plosive at the end of words such as being, and this can occur in Singapore English (Setter &038 Deterding, 2003) as is evident from the following utterance from the NIECSSE head teacher (Deterding &038 Low, 2001) then the distribution of ? is entirely predictable, so it is an allophone and not a phoneme. e ventually we might note that words such as long /l?? /, strong /str?? / and young /j ? / have no final / /, but there is a / / when a comparative suffix is added longer /l?? ?/, stronger /str?? ?/, younger /j ? ?/.So this seems to lend further support to the possible existence in the base form of these words of a final / / which gets deleted in some circumstances. (But note that there is no / / with the ing suffix or the agentive er suffix singing /s???? / and singer /s??? / not */s?? ?? / and */s?? ?/. ) In conclusion, we can say that, on the basis of minimal pairs, /? / is generally regarded as a phoneme of English, but that there are some counter-arguments which raise a few questions about its status. 26 David Deterding REFERENCES Deterding, D. (2004). How many vowel sounds are there in English?STETS Language &038 Communication Review, 19(10) 19-21. Deterding, D. &038 Low, E. L. (2001). The NIE corpus of spoken Singapore English (NIECSSE). SAAL Quarterly, 56 25. Ladefoged, P. (2 001). A course in phonetics (4th edition). Fort Worth Harcourt College Publishers. Laver, J. (1994). Principles of phonetics. Cambridge Cambridge University Press. Lim, S. H. &038 Deterding, D. (2005). Added final plosives in Singapore English. In D. Deterding, A. Brown and E. L. Low (Eds. ), English in Singapore phonetic research on a corpus, pp. 37-42. Singapore McGraw Hill. Mugglestone, L. 2003). Talking proper The alternate of accent as a social symbol (2nd edition). Oxford Oxford University Press. Roach, P. (2000). English phonetics and phonology A practical course (3rd edition). Cambridge Cambridge University Press. Setter, J. &038 Deterding, D. (2003, August). Extra final consonants in the English of Hong Kong and Singapore. Paper presented at the International Conference of Phonetic Sciences, Barcelona. Wells, J. (1982). Accents of English. Cambridge Cambridge University Press. Copyright 2005 Singapore Tertiary English Teachers Society (STETS)